Hi, I don't think it's a bad idea, but could there be a more specific or domain-related name for it? Component(Base) is very generic, whereas Appender(Skeleton) is more logging-domain-specific.
Yoav --- Ceki G�lc� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anybody think it is a bad idea? If yes, any alternatives? > > At 06:35 PM 1/3/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >ceki 2005/01/03 09:35:26 > > > > Modified: src/java/org/apache/log4j AppenderSkeleton.java > > Appender.java > > Added: src/java/org/apache/log4j/spi Component.java > > ComponentBase.java > > Log: > > - Log4j interfaces implement o.a.l.spi.Component and base classes > > extend ComponentBase. Started by changing the Appender interface and > > AppenderSkeleton class, > > other changes wil follow. > > -- > > Ceki G�lc� > > The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
