Hola, > JUL was probably never designed to be a front end but rather as the
Yup. > Maybe we should consider an independent project acting as a facade for the > existing alogging APIs. Comments? I'd prefer a fixed Jakarta commons-logging over a brand new project. I see a dead-end in the current JCL 1.x tree, and a new JCL 2.0 that is a combined effort from logging services, Jakarta, Tomcat, and other interested parties. It'll probably break backwards compatibility, but it will work. Yoav --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
