Hi Yoav,
On 2005-03-24 13:55:37 GMT, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> I'd prefer a fixed Jakarta commons-logging over a brand new project. > I see a dead-end in the current JCL 1.x tree, and a new JCL 2.0 that > is a combined effort from logging services, Jakarta, Tomcat, and other > interested parties. It'll probably break backwards compatibility, but > it will work.
How can we have confidence when the existing JCL causes so many problems for log4j users, especially when even the mere existence of these problems have been denied for so long? It seems unrealistic, doesn't it?
-- Ceki G�lc�
The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
