On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 22:09 -0500, Jacob Kjome wrote: > >I am not a member of the slf4j team, so I cannot speak to it's goals, etc. > > I think just about any Log4j committer is part of the slf4j team, unless I > am mistaken. I'm guessing that this probably also extends to > commons-logging developers. In any case, I wouldn't characterize you as > not being part of the slf4j team. I think if you show a development or > steering interest, you are probably part of the team. Ceki, can you > clarify this? I think there is some ambiguity here. How does one become a > committer on the slf4j project? Does one need to have commit access to be > considered part of the slf4j project team?
Actually, as SLF4J is just 4 simple core classes + 2 classes per concrete logging library, there isn't much need for a large pool of committers. I would say 3 people (to ensure project continuity) is as many as SLF4J would ever need. The number of people who can *vote* on SLF4J design-related matters is a different issue. I guess the committers for SLF4J are the ones that decide the policy on that, but I would recommend that the policy be that * the committers on SLF4J * plus any committer on log4j * plus any committer on JCL all be entitled to vote, and that voting follow standard ASF procedures. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
