-1 I think that moving to require 1.2 was enough of a jump. If we start to
restrict the JDK's we support to only the more recent, then the usefulness
of log4j will be diluted, imo.
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curt Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Developers List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 6:31 PM
Subject: log4j 1.3 minimum JDK (was Re: [VOTE] Release log4j 1.2.12rc3)
On Aug 15, 2005, at 8:23 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
This does beg the question that one of the original design goals of
log4j 1.3 was that it's minimum requirement would be JDK 1.2. Are we
still all in favour of that? I would like to think that JDK 1.3 would
be an acceptable minimum in this day and age?
I think we need to break that off into another thread to not confuse the
issue. I could be persuaded. We'd also should specify whether we target
J2ME or some other subset.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
