+1 I don't mind putting it up for a vote, but we could make it a lazy approval vote.
Let's agree on something and get it in the 'Actions' section of the bylaws. -----Original Message----- From: Yoav Shapira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:36 AM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] log4j 1.3 alpha 7 release Hi, +1, and I also don't think we need a vote to release an alpha (or beta, +or RC) build, only a vote on declaring something stable. Yoav --- Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Mark Womack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > This is vote to decide if the current build of log4j 1.3 alpha 7 > > should be released. If accepted, the build located at: > > > > http://cvs.apache.org/builds/logging/log4j/log4j-1.3a7/ > > > > would be moved to the release area, with the related signed > > versions, and the related download pages would be updated > > accordingly (PMC approval, of course). > > > > I am +1. > > > > +1, although does an alpha really need a vote? > > Jake > > > -Mark > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sloan School of Management Cambridge, MA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
