Curt, before I re-enable the FileWatchdog test case, can you try it on your machine? I cleaned it up some, but looking at the code I'm not sure how it was still printing the debug message. It explicitly checks the level on the logger is INFO before printing any messages. But try it now.

thanks,
-Mark

----- Original Message ----- From: "Curt Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt


I don't think this fixes the problem since I was seeing that sometimes the generated files contained DEBUG and other times it didn't. My Mac build will now fails with the new witness files since the generated files contain the DEBUG line.

The previous Gump failures show inconsistent generated files. In http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=113766882315669&w=2, DEBUG is missing in the generated files but present in the witness. In http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=113761865108336&w=2, DEBUG is present in the generated files but missing in the witness.

My supposition is there is some delay in these tests that is sometime sufficient for a watchdog action to be completed, but sometime isn't.

On Jan 19, 2006, at 10:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: mwomack
Date: Thu Jan 19 20:18:47 2006
New Revision: 370726

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=370726&view=rev
Log:
Restoring file watchdog witness files

Modified:
logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog/ watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog/ watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to