On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 11:31 -0600, Jess Holle wrote: > I'd be fine with requiring Java 5 for log4j 1.3 and using the best > concurrency, etc, utilities it has to offer.
Ah, "concurrency" -- my favorite Log4j word... I can't really see what Java 5 would provide in terms of better concurrency other than standardized lock classes. However, if you wanted, you could write your library as 1.5 then make it run on 1.4: http://retroweaver.sourceforge.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
