On Jun 23, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
The test case looks fine.
Anyone opposed to me merging this into the 1.2 branch, added to a
new org.apache.log4j.jul package.
Yes, I am opposed at the moment. log4j 1.2.15's release is imminent
and would really like to avoid adding a new enhancement right at the
end of a review cycle. Plus, it likely depends on JDK 1.4 which
log4j 1.2 can be built (using Ant) on JDK 1.3. Plus, I'm not
convinced that it needs to be in log4j itself, but isn't better
packaged as a companion.
I haven't been tracking the JUL <-> log4j stuff as well as I would
like, but there are enough things that I'm unsettled with that I'm
not ready to see them in an imminent release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
