On 08/04/2010, at 3:12 PM, Curt Arnold wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote: >> >>> Fixing it right would require either changing the Maven plugin or adding >>> steps in our build to correct it after it is built and should be done for >>> 1.2.17. >> >> Are you saying the Maven default javadoc build included .svn? I've never >> seen that before. >> > > Yes.
I found http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-232 and http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-173. I'm not sure what version of the plugin you are using - but does one of them cover it? > > >>> >>> I've asked for sync'ing instructions on reposit...@apache since the process >>> has apparently changed. I haven't had a response yet and have not taken >>> any actions, so 1.2.16 is not yet on its way to the Maven repo and its >>> mirrors. Are you familiar with the current process? Would it be better to >>> delay pushing syncing the Maven repo until we have a replacement >>> javadoc.jar or could we add it at a later time? >> >> Your question hasn't got through - not sure who is moderating it these days. > > Surprising since I'm subscribed to the list. It's the gmail thing. I just manually moderated it through and added your gmail to the allow list. I think all the moderators on there are travelling at the moment. > > >> >> There is an alternative process if you want to change, but the old way still >> works if you've used it before. > > Couldn't find the old way documented anymore which I think was syncing the M1 > repo. Is copying to /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository > and changing the permissions the new way or does the new way involve Nexus. Either of those work, but the m1 technique won't any more. When you said 'old' way I thought you'd meant the m2 rsync that most had been using up until recently. > >> >> Speaking of moderation - my first response got rejected because >> br...@apache.org is not a subscriber. This is quite common when using google >> apps mail with ezmlm. Is there a reason the log4j lists are not moderated? > > > I believe it was that way when I inherited list management. The log4php > mailing lists were switched to moderation and I was swamped with spam > moderation requests. I'd hate to be on the receiving end of the log4j > directed spam. Moderators would probably find the volume is about the same on each list. Anyway, let infra know if that's something that someone wants to take up - I just thought I'd point out that it's an unusual configuration and can have some pitfalls with gmail. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
