https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48704
--- Comment #14 from [email protected] 2010-04-22 11:18:38 EDT --- Hi iam seeing that log4j version 16 got released sometime in April ..so did this patch make it in by any chance ? Thanks ! (In reply to comment #13) > Iam sorry .you are correct I performed my test on windows env the other day > with log back ..today I compiled and ran the same code in Solaris 5.10 env > with > jdk150_11 and got the same results. > I used TimeBasedRolling with prudent mode( as there were some constraints with > using size based rolling with prudent mode in logback) and tried to roll same > file from two multithreaded java instances pointing to the same log file and > the rolling and logging worked well as far as I can tell found no issues with > Solaris. > Btw ..thank you for the fix ..I will look forward to it on the next release of > log4j. > (In reply to comment #12) > > Reverted in rev 910151. > > The independent authorship of the patch is disputed, see log4j-dev mailing > > list > > on 2010-02-14. Since a release push for log4j 1.2.16 is underway, it seems > > prudent to pull the patch for the time being. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
