On May 14, 2010, at 2:01 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:

> Den 14/05/10 09.22, Ralph Goers skrev:
>> 2. I don't like the way Logback binds to the implementation. I used a 
>> technique I had used in a previous logging framework and used a file to 
>> define the implementation class. In theory, the API could be modified to 
>> support multiple logging implementation simultaneously, although I have no 
>> plans to implement that.
>>   
> You mean slf4j binding to logback?

Technically, SLF4J binding to any implementation. But yes, Logback is usually 
the implementaion.

Ralph


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to