On May 14, 2010, at 2:01 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote: > Den 14/05/10 09.22, Ralph Goers skrev: >> 2. I don't like the way Logback binds to the implementation. I used a >> technique I had used in a previous logging framework and used a file to >> define the implementation class. In theory, the API could be modified to >> support multiple logging implementation simultaneously, although I have no >> plans to implement that. >> > You mean slf4j binding to logback?
Technically, SLF4J binding to any implementation. But yes, Logback is usually the implementaion. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
