On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Curt Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >>> Pulling old Chainsaw and lf5 out of core would have probably made up for the >>> difference..but hey, that ship has sailed...maybe they could all be pulled >>> into extras (component and receivers?) >> >> You mean, move the code from component and receivers into the extras trunk? >> I am +1 on this - we could even kill the parent project then and get >> rid of three releases and make only one for all > > > I was playing catch on this one once the Gump builds started failing and then > not finding any commit notifications in the email. I didn't see the heads up. > > The motivation to have "companions" as a distinct products was not to keep > the log4j.jar trim, but allow the companions to be available for people who > were stuck with older versions of log4j 1.2 (due to package managers or other > software bundlers liking to distribution ancient versions of log4j 1.2). > > I am not aware of any other users of components and receivers other than > Chainsaw, so another option would be to roll them into Chainsaw.
hey thats a pretty good idea too. Then Scott is 100% independent with Chainsaw. After all, if somebody *really* needs the classes he can put the chainsaw jar onto his classpath or extract them himself. Cheers Christian > I have no attachment to Ant builds for component, receivers or Chainsaw. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
