Shouldn't the dependency be updated to 1.2.17? Gary
On Aug 6, 2012, at 0:03, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > The test dependency is there because there are a few classes that test the > performance of Log4j 1.x vs Log4j 2 vs Logback. The test dependencies could > be removed but then those classes would have to go to some other sub-project. > > Ralph > > On Aug 5, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Scott Deboy wrote: > >> All (especially Ralph), >> >> I'm going through what it will take to get extras, receivers and Chainsaw >> over to log4j2. It's going to be a lot of work. I'm sure there are also >> some missing pieces we'll need to work through, but I need to do it now >> while log4j2 is alpha. I may give up on Chainsaw being a log4j2 thing. We >> shall see. >> >> The first thing I saw was a test dependency in core on log4j 1.2.16. It >> seems log4j2 should depend on nothing from log4j (1). Is this something you >> can remove? >> >> There will be many more posts, will try not to flood the list. >> >> Scott >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
