Yes Ralph
On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > Shouldn't the dependency be updated to 1.2.17? > > Gary > > On Aug 6, 2012, at 0:03, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The test dependency is there because there are a few classes that test the >> performance of Log4j 1.x vs Log4j 2 vs Logback. The test dependencies could >> be removed but then those classes would have to go to some other sub-project. >> >> Ralph >> >> On Aug 5, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Scott Deboy wrote: >> >>> All (especially Ralph), >>> >>> I'm going through what it will take to get extras, receivers and Chainsaw >>> over to log4j2. It's going to be a lot of work. I'm sure there are also >>> some missing pieces we'll need to work through, but I need to do it now >>> while log4j2 is alpha. I may give up on Chainsaw being a log4j2 thing. We >>> shall see. >>> >>> The first thing I saw was a test dependency in core on log4j 1.2.16. It >>> seems log4j2 should depend on nothing from log4j (1). Is this something >>> you can remove? >>> >>> There will be many more posts, will try not to flood the list. >>> >>> Scott >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
