+1 for "all" On Oct 31, 2012 8:32 PM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All: > > I find the name "log4j-combined-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar" unhelpful if not > confusing considering we produce: > > api\target\log4j-api-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar > combined\target\log4j-combined-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar > core\target\log4j-core-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar > flume-ng\target\log4j-flume-ng-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar > jcl-bridge\target\log4j-jcl-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar > log4j12-api\target\log4j12-api-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar > slf4j-impl\target\slf4j-impl-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar > web\target\log4j-web-2.0-beta3-SNAPSHOT.jar > > So "combined" between what and what? I know it's api and core because I > read that recently around here but it's not crystal clear. How about > calling it log4j-api+core.jar just to be clear? > > But my point really is that I'd prefer not to have to think about which > jars to include and just have a log4j-all.jar. > > In one project I work with we are approaching 100 third party jars. I'd > rather have my Ivy (or Maven) build just say "log4j-all" just like I say > "jetty-all" and "cxf-bundle". > > I know some folks have to worry about moving bytes around and sipping RAM, > but other folks don't, so now that we've made the 'give me lots of little > jars' crowd happy, can we make the 'keep it simple' crowd happy too with a > log4j-all.jar? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
