+1. Yes, the ability for log4j 2 to provide native JMX support would be fantastic. There are only custom solutions for this with log4j 1.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote: > Features I would like to see in JMX: > 1. Show all the LoggerContexts and their configurations. > 2. Ability to modify a configuration (this should involve cloning the > current configuration, modifying it and then replacing the prior > configuration with the new one). > 3. Statistics from various components. > 4. Display log output on the JMX console (at least the StatusLogger > output). > > > > > On Apr 2, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > I would like to take a stab at implementing JMX support for log4j2. > > What features would you like to see with regards to JMX? Ideas are welcome! > > >
