+1
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > The fewer jars the better IMO. > > Gary > > On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:53, Remko Popma <rem...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > These all look doable. > > About Statistics from various components, @Ralph, anything in particular > you'd like to see? (If not, it is pretty easy to add them later.) > > Also, can the JMX related classes go into core or does this need a > separate module? > I would prefer core so that this is always available for users without > fiddling with extra jars. > Thoughts? > > > On 2013/04/03, at 9:35, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > Features I would like to see in JMX: > 1. Show all the LoggerContexts and their configurations. > 2. Ability to modify a configuration (this should involve cloning the > current configuration, modifying it and then replacing the prior > configuration with the new one). > 3. Statistics from various components. > 4. Display log output on the JMX console (at least the StatusLogger > output). > > > > > On Apr 2, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > I would like to take a stab at implementing JMX support for log4j2. > > What features would you like to see with regards to JMX? Ideas are welcome! > > >
