There already existed an o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.db package that was empty. I discovered that I could create a base AbstractDatabaseAppender that took care of some operations common to JDBC, JPA /and/ NoSQL appenders. That led me to use the existing db package as follows:
db/ common DB appender classes jdbc/ JDBC appender classes jpa/ JPA appender classes nosql/ NoSQL appender classes I think that package structure makes a lot of sense. I'm open to convincing arguments otherwise. Nick On Apr 27, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I think we should keep the packaging simpler: o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.jpa > > Gary > > On Apr 27, 2013, at 10:15, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> > wrote: > >> o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.db.jpa > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature