On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Nick Williams < nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
> There already existed an o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.db package that was > empty. I discovered that I could create a base AbstractDatabaseAppender > that took care of some operations common to JDBC, JPA /and/ NoSQL > appenders. That led me to use the existing db package as follows: > > db/ > common DB appender classes > What is in common? Gary > jdbc/ > JDBC appender classes > jpa/ > JPA appender classes > nosql/ > NoSQL appender classes > > I think that package structure makes a lot of sense. I'm open to > convincing arguments otherwise. > > Nick > > On Apr 27, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > I think we should keep the packaging simpler: > o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.jpa > > > > Gary > > > > On Apr 27, 2013, at 10:15, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> > wrote: > > > >> o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.db.jpa > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > > > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
