I guess what you are after is a way to make clear what are the interfaces and classes developers can use when creating their own components. I originally planned on those being in the main core package but I clearly didn't include everything that could be there. Unfortunately, this is one of the things Java isn't particularly good at. I don't know of a good way to indicate what is internal vs OK to use other than comments.
Ralph On Aug 16, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > Yeah. StrLookup should be moved up to core. > > I tried it and feels arbitrary when I look at all the subpackages and wonder > which of all the other interfaces should also be moved up. > > If we had a specific .spi package it might be better, but that does not > really make sense in the Core module, right? > > It seems neat and tidy if an interface foo is in the .foo package. > > Gary > > Ralph > > On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > It seems inconsistent to me, but then StrLookup should be moved up to > > match the style of the others? > > > > Gary > > > > On Aug 16, 2013, at 22:05, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > > >> StrLookup > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
