Well then, I suppose we could move things like Configurator and Configuration to the core package and then move all the sub packages under "internal", but that just seems like a lot of busy work when we could just as easily declare in a read me that everything in any sub package is internal.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > The way I've seen this done in Java is to use a package called ".spi", the > Service Provider Interface package. Internal stuff is in ".internal" packages > (which Eclipse uses a lot). When you import something from a ".internal" > package, you know you're not on solid ground. I've also seen ".impl" > packages, which IMO is not a good name. I've never seen a .private. package > though. > > Gary > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > I guess what you are after is a way to make clear what are the interfaces and > classes developers can use when creating their own components. I originally > planned on those being in the main core package but I clearly didn't include > everything that could be there. Unfortunately, this is one of the things > Java isn't particularly good at. I don't know of a good way to indicate what > is internal vs OK to use other than comments. > > Ralph > > On Aug 16, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> wrote: >> Yeah. StrLookup should be moved up to core. >> >> I tried it and feels arbitrary when I look at all the subpackages and wonder >> which of all the other interfaces should also be moved up. >> >> If we had a specific .spi package it might be better, but that does not >> really make sense in the Core module, right? >> >> It seems neat and tidy if an interface foo is in the .foo package. >> >> Gary >> >> Ralph >> >> On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> > It seems inconsistent to me, but then StrLookup should be moved up to >> > match the style of the others? >> > >> > Gary >> > >> > On Aug 16, 2013, at 22:05, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> > >> >> StrLookup >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
