I vote for 2.0.0... and my vote is non-binding. :-)
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Nick Williams < nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: > I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the printers > Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Level was extendable!), > and I need to know what the Maven artifact GA version number will be. I > print the new Maven artifacts used in each chapter on the first page of the > chapter as a guide to the user. Log4j is the only library I'm using that > isn't yet GA. I want to be sure the version numbers I'm printing are > correct. > > Here are the options that I can think of for the GA release: > > 2.0 > 2.0-GA > 2.0.GA > 2.0.Final > 2.0.RELEASE > 2.0.0 > 2.0.0-GA > 2.0.0.GA > 2.0.0.Final > 2.0.0.RELEASE > > So, which is it going to be? I assume that eventually we're going to have > a 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc., so it would seem to me that, whatever GA is, it > should start with 2.0.0. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to go from 2.0 > to 2.0.1. However, all of our beta releases have been 2.0-Betan. > > Thoughts? > > Nick > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > > -- Cheers, Paul
