I know we have all contributed, but it is kind of Ralph's baby... I propose
we let Ralph decide.


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Andreas Opitz <many...@googlemail.com>wrote:

> +1
>
>
> 2014-02-03 Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net>:
>
> I've seen some people say 2.0.0 and some people say they figured it would
>> be 2.0 but 2.0.0 would be fine. Since we will eventually release a 2.0.1, I
>> propose that we keep the version numbers the same consistent length (and
>> follow a convention most other OSS projects use), and release GA as "2.0.0"
>> without any other qualifiers (no GA, no Final, etc.).
>>
>> All in favor? :-)
>>
>> N
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 4:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>> > Also 2.0 or 2.0.0 for me
>> >
>> > On 3 Feb 2014, at 7:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> >
>> >> I had thought it would be 2.0.
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my iPad
>> >>
>> >>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Nick Williams <
>> nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the printers
>> Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Level was extendable!),
>> and I need to know what the Maven artifact GA version number will be. I
>> print the new Maven artifacts used in each chapter on the first page of the
>> chapter as a guide to the user. Log4j is the only library I'm using that
>> isn't yet GA. I want to be sure the version numbers I'm printing are
>> correct.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here are the options that I can think of for the GA release:
>> >>>
>> >>> 2.0
>> >>> 2.0-GA
>> >>> 2.0.GA
>> >>> 2.0.Final
>> >>> 2.0.RELEASE
>> >>> 2.0.0
>> >>> 2.0.0-GA
>> >>> 2.0.0.GA
>> >>> 2.0.0.Final
>> >>> 2.0.0.RELEASE
>> >>>
>> >>> So, which is it going to be? I assume that eventually we're going to
>> have a 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc., so it would seem to me that, whatever GA is, it
>> should start with 2.0.0. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to go from 2.0
>> to 2.0.1. However, all of our beta releases have been 2.0-Betan.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>> Nick
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> > ---
>> > http://www.grobmeier.de
>> > The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>> > @grobmeier
>> > GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to