I've been reading up on Camel lately. Maybe we could adopt some conventions from there?
On 25 March 2014 10:29, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > We have JMS receivers and a SocketServer. I would expect that the > XMLSocketReceiver is expecting log events in XML format? If so, it would > seem that extending SocketServer to do that wouldn’t be very hard. > > Ralph > > > > On Mar 25, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We need to add receivers to log4j2 :) > > Dcott > On Mar 25, 2014 5:19 AM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All: >> >> Our server uses v1's org.apache.log4j.net.XMLSocketReceiver. >> >> I do not see a v2 equivalent. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second >> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
