On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been reading up on Camel lately. Maybe we could adopt some > conventions from there? > Please explain. Gary > > > On 25 March 2014 10:29, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > >> We have JMS receivers and a SocketServer. I would expect that the >> XMLSocketReceiver is expecting log events in XML format? If so, it would >> seem that extending SocketServer to do that wouldn’t be very hard. >> >> Ralph >> >> >> >> On Mar 25, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We need to add receivers to log4j2 :) >> >> Dcott >> On Mar 25, 2014 5:19 AM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All: >>> >>> Our server uses v1's org.apache.log4j.net.XMLSocketReceiver. >>> >>> I do not see a v2 equivalent. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second >>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> >> > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
