IIRC we already had the 1st round of voting.

Gary

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Ralph Goers 
<rgo...@apache.org> </div><div>Date:04/27/2014  10:35  (GMT-05:00) 
</div><div>To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org> 
</div><div>Subject: Re: What's left before we can release RC2? </div><div>
</div>Select one!

Ralph

On Apr 27, 2014, at 5:42 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:

I wouldn't mind if we rolled out another RC release. 
What is our next action on the logo contest? (I forget, it's been a while... 
:-) )

Remko

Sent from my iPhone

On 2014/04/08, at 8:32, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:

Alright, so far, it looks like the list of things we want to get done for RC2 
are:

* XML and JSON socket receivers
* Marker API changes
* LoggerStream/LoggerWriter API and implementation
* LifeCycle states

And in general, things that are blocking 2.0:
* Memory leaks due to shutdown thread and JMX (570, 578)
* Commons Logging usage in WildFly (546)
* How do you even use Log4j with OSGi? (345, 346, 373)
* Exception deserialization (542)


On 7 April 2014 17:46, Bruce Brouwer <bruce.brou...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think we should address LOG4J-547 to at least some degree. Minimally, I head 
some support for removing streams from log4j-api. I can submit a more complete 
patch if I can have some questions answered (e.g. should we switch walking the 
call stack to be bottom-up instead of top-down, should it go in its own 
artifact, ...)


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
And I want to get make the Marker API changes.

Also, we need to finish the logo contest.

Ralph

On Apr 7, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:

I think that would be good. I'd like to see what we all think about a more 
comprehensive life cycle state machine that works more like how LoggerContext 
does. I'm working on a patch proposal for that, but it is a non-trivial change 
that affects lots of classes in log4j-core. If this seems like a good idea, it 
might be a good idea to get this in before RC2 as well.


On 7 April 2014 15:42, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
I've just figured out how to workaround a Jackson bug in order to do XML and 
JSON server socket receivers.

We can wait for me to get this in this week (hopefully) for RC2, or not :)

Gary


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
There's been a bunch of work done since RC1. It might be a good idea to get 
another release candidate going.

-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
JUnit in Action, Second Edition
Spring Batch in Action
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory



-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>




-- 

Bruce Brouwer



-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to