Reminder link: https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations
Can we use Apache Steve for handling voting? :-P On 27 April 2014 10:15, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > IIRC we already had the 1st round of voting. > > Gary > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Ralph Goers > Date:04/27/2014 10:35 (GMT-05:00) > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: What's left before we can release RC2? > > Select one! > > Ralph > > On Apr 27, 2014, at 5:42 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I wouldn't mind if we rolled out another RC release. > What is our next action on the logo contest? (I forget, it's been a > while... :-) ) > > Remko > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2014/04/08, at 8:32, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Alright, so far, it looks like the list of things we want to get done for > RC2 are: > > * XML and JSON socket receivers > * Marker API changes > * LoggerStream/LoggerWriter API and implementation > * LifeCycle states > > And in general, things that are blocking 2.0: > * Memory leaks due to shutdown thread and JMX (570, 578) > * Commons Logging usage in WildFly (546) > * How do you even use Log4j with OSGi? (345, 346, 373) > * Exception deserialization (542) > > > On 7 April 2014 17:46, Bruce Brouwer <bruce.brou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think we should address LOG4J-547 to at least some degree. Minimally, I >> head some support for removing streams from log4j-api. I can submit a more >> complete patch if I can have some questions answered (e.g. should we switch >> walking the call stack to be bottom-up instead of top-down, should it go in >> its own artifact, ...) >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ralph Goers >> <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote: >> >>> And I want to get make the Marker API changes. >>> >>> Also, we need to finish the logo contest. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> On Apr 7, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think that would be good. I'd like to see what we all think about a >>> more comprehensive life cycle state machine that works more like how >>> LoggerContext does. I'm working on a patch proposal for that, but it is a >>> non-trivial change that affects lots of classes in log4j-core. If this >>> seems like a good idea, it might be a good idea to get this in before RC2 >>> as well. >>> >>> >>> On 7 April 2014 15:42, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I've just figured out how to workaround a Jackson bug in order to do >>>> XML and JSON server socket receivers. >>>> >>>> We can wait for me to get this in this week (hopefully) for RC2, or not >>>> :) >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> There's been a bunch of work done since RC1. It might be a good idea >>>>> to get another release candidate going. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second >>>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Bruce Brouwer >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
