[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14059646#comment-14059646
 ] 

Sean Bridges commented on LOG4J2-702:
-------------------------------------

I don't think your example code works, I added some comments below,

{code}
  public void logEvent(final LogEvent event) {
        loggerConfig.incRef();  
        try {
            config.getConfigurationMonitor().checkConfiguration();
            //loggerConfig here may not be == to the loggerConfig you called 
incRef() on
            loggerConfig.log(event);
        } finally {
            //loggerConfig here may not be == to the loggerConfig you called 
incRef() on
            loggerConfig.decRef();
        }
    }
{code}

This also doesn't work,

{code}
LoggerConfig origConfig = loggerConfig;
origConfig.incRef();
try {
    //use origConfig
    //however this is the same as the original problem
} finally {
   origConfig.decRef();
}
{code}

> LoggerConfig#waitForCompletion is not thread safe
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-702
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-rc2
>            Reporter: Sean Bridges
>            Assignee: Matt Sicker
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> This is in trunk, svn commit 1608156
> LoggerConfig#waitForCompletion uses an AtomicInteger counter to try to detect 
> if there are any calls currently executing the log(Event) method, but it does 
> not do so in a thread safe manner.  Consider two threads A and B, where 
> Thread A is calling clearAppenders(), and Thread B is calling log(Event),
> {code}
> Thread A  loggerConfig.clearAppenders()
> Thread A  loggerConfig.waitForCompletion()
> Thread A  counter.get() //returns 0
> Thread A  //loggerConfig.waitForCompletion() returns
> Thread B  loggerConfig.log(Event)
> Thread B  counter.increment()
> Thread A  proceeds assuming no log calls are onging, but thread B is in the 
> log method
> {code}
> I'm not sure what the requirements are, but if the requirement is to not lose 
> logging events, I think you need some sort of synchronization outside of the 
> LoggerConfig object.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to