If we switch to Git, we should make SVN read-only to avoid any confusion. Gary
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > +0.5 > Not familiar enough with this to vote with more confidence. I'd vote +1 > if we can use svn and Git in parallel. (Does Apache Git support svn > extensions?) > > On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> On Aug 5, 2014 7:18 AM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This topic was brought up elsewhere, so I'd like to propose a vote on >>> switching to Git. >>> >>> +1 for me >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >> -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
