After reading about this more I'm changing my vote to +1. This was an interesting read: http://blogs.atlassian.com/2013/01/svn-to-git-how-atlassian-made-the-switch-without-sacrificing-active-development/
Ivan, can you tell us about your experiences with switching? On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > If there is the requirement that people often work offline it makes sense, > otherwise it's just another versioning tool. Do you work mostly in a > train, jet, ..? Once that is answered i'll vote. :-) > > I personally like more the distributed ones. If i had to order the tools i > work with based on how much i like them this would be the result: > > 1 Hg > 2 Git > 3 Svn > 4 Cvs > > Cheers > On 5 Aug 2014 19:56, "Bruno Mahé" <bm...@tango.me> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> We moved to Git at Apache Bigtop and everyone loved it. >> Note that most people were using git-svn before. >> >> Thanks, >> Bruno >> >> Le 08/05/2014 07:18 AM, Matt Sicker a écrit : >> >> This topic was brought up elsewhere, so I'd like to propose a vote on >> switching to Git. >> >> +1 for me >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Bruno >> >>
