Hate them all but nothing good pops to mind right now. Frankly, I find the "streams" in java 8 a confusing term. When I looked at it I was reminded of Cocoon pipelines. I wish they had used that term instead.
Sent from my iPad > On Sep 2, 2014, at 7:35 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, plain 'streams' is not great. Let's see... we are talking about java.io > classes that are OutputStreams, InputStreams, Writers, and Readers. > > - log4j-java.io > Can you have a . in a module name like that without causing confusion, it > kinda looks weird but it the best IMO. > - log4j-javaio > - log4j-javaio-bridge > > ? > > Gary > > >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >> Using the name "streams" might be confusing the Java 1.8 streams (aka lazily >> evaluated functions/map-reduce). I'd almost suggest javaio or jio or >> something similar to emphasise the compatibility. >> >> >>> On 2 September 2014 09:22, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Should the new module name/ID be: >>> >>> - log4j-streams >>> - log4j-streaming >>> - log4j-<your suggestion> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>> Spring Batch in Action >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
