I'm ok with log4j-streams and log4j-iostreams. Sent from my iPhone
> On 2014/09/03, at 11:41, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > > Much better > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Sep 2, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Maybe log4j-iostreams? >> >> >>> On 2 September 2014 21:35, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yeah, plain 'streams' is not great. Let's see... we are talking about >>> java.io classes that are OutputStreams, InputStreams, Writers, and Readers. >>> >>> - log4j-java.io >>> Can you have a . in a module name like that without causing confusion, >>> it kinda looks weird but it the best IMO. >>> - log4j-javaio >>> - log4j-javaio-bridge >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Using the name "streams" might be confusing the Java 1.8 streams (aka >>>> lazily evaluated functions/map-reduce). I'd almost suggest javaio or jio >>>> or something similar to emphasise the compatibility. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 2 September 2014 09:22, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Should the new module name/ID be: >>>>> >>>>> - log4j-streams >>>>> - log4j-streaming >>>>> - log4j-<your suggestion> >>>>> >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>> Spring Batch in Action >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
