I'm also fine with just doing a 2.1 and following up with 2.1.x releases if issues are found.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless we have some way to have more than one release on the site, making > it 2.1 might be our best bet. > > On 22 September 2014 11:01, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Do we need to have a 2.1-beta release, or shall we just do a 2.1 release >> (and follow up with 2.1.1 etc if issues are found)? >> >> When are we aiming to do this release? >> >> There are still ~10 open Jira tickets targetting 2.1. >> Please take a look to see if that list is up to date. >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >
