Matt, It seems like the consensus is to skip a beta.
You may want to send a [poll] email and get a more formal feel for it. Gary On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > How would I even be able to release the beta artifacts? The "release" > profile doesn't seem appropriate. > > On 22 September 2014 12:15, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm also fine with just doing a 2.1 and following up with 2.1.x releases >> if issues are found. >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Unless we have some way to have more than one release on the site, >>> making it 2.1 might be our best bet. >>> >>> On 22 September 2014 11:01, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Do we need to have a 2.1-beta release, or shall we just do a 2.1 >>>> release (and follow up with 2.1.1 etc if issues are found)? >>>> >>>> When are we aiming to do this release? >>>> >>>> There are still ~10 open Jira tickets targetting 2.1. >>>> Please take a look to see if that list is up to date. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
