I believe we are in agreement for 1074 (pls let me know if not) and I just need to implement it. Doesn't seem very tricky, should be able to complete coming weekend. Would like to include it if possible.
I have a fix ready for 1030 (header at top of file only). If we can agree on that I can commit (tests all pass). Sent from my iPhone > On 2015/07/07, at 0:45, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > > I had planned on committing the fix for 812 as soon as I got agreement from > everyone that it is the right approach. The code is all done and all the unit > tests pass. > > Ralph > >> On Jul 6, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Thinking aloud: >> >> It feels like the changes we are discussing in LOG4J-812 and LOG4J-1074 are >> important and tricky to get right. >> >> I wonder if the project would benefit from releasing the large set of fixes, >> features, and updates we have now as 2.4 and then getting back to working on >> LOG4J-812 and LOG4J-1074 for 2.5. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Gary >> >>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> I’ve assigned Jiras I would like to work on to myself. There are probably >>> more I’d like to do. That said, I probably won’t get to them before 2.4 is >>> released. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>>> On Jun 27, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Devs, >>>> >>>> Curious: Do you all have set list of JIRAs you are addressing before 2.4? >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> End of June sounds good. >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------- Original message -------- >>>>> From: Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: 06/02/2015 15:09 (GMT-08:00) >>>>> To: Log4J Developers List <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: Releasing 2.4 >>>>> >>>>> I would prefer to find some time to work on some issues instead of >>>>> spending that on doing a release. But no later than the end of June. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 2, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It's been almost a month since 2.3 and we already have a nice little >>>>>> batch of changes for 2.4. >>>>>> >>>>>> In particular, the 1.2 compatibility fixes to NDC pop() and peek() would >>>>>> be good to push out ASAP. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Gary >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
