[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14662153#comment-14662153
]
Gary Gregory edited comment on LOG4J2-599 at 8/7/15 5:58 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Here is one argument against all these names: What about efficient APIs for
{code:java}
org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger.debug(Marker, String, Object...)
{code}
Like:
{code:java}
org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger.debug(Marker, String, Object)
org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger.debug(Marker, String, Object, Object)
org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger.debug(Marker, String, Object, Object, Object)
{code}
and so on for trace, info, ...
If we add more public APIs, we should add all that we need, like the above.
Otherwise we'll end up with:
- Logger
- Logger2 extends Logger
- Logger3 extends Logger2
- ...
was (Author: garydgregory):
Here is one argument against all these names: What about efficient APIs for
{code:java}
org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger.debug(Marker, String, Object...)
{code}
Like:
{code:java}
org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger.debug(Marker, String, Object)
org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger.debug(Marker, String, Object, Object)
org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger.debug(Marker, String, Object, Object, Object)
{code}
and so on for trace, info, ...
> Support lambda functions (or similar) for log message parameters
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-599
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-599
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Matt Sicker
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: Java8
>
> It would be nice if we could support 0-param lambda functions (or the
> equivalent: interfaces with a single empty-parameter message call), or more
> simply, allow Runnables (or something similar) to be passed which will be
> dynamically executed if the log message is enabled.
> The use case here is that although string construction of the log message is
> a performance issue that is already solved quite well, the problem of adding
> in information to the log message that makes other calculations still needs
> to be wrapped in an if check.
> I'm not sure if it'd be best to just use Runnable, or create a new interface,
> or try to emulate how Java 1.8 lambdas work via an interface with a single
> method defined. The details here would still need to be fleshed out, but I
> think this sort of feature could be rather handy (especially in a Java 1.8+
> environment, or in Groovy/Scala/etc.).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
