[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14662811#comment-14662811
 ] 

Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-599 at 8/8/15 5:11 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------

I just looked at the branch and am struggling a little bit with what I see - it 
doesn't strike me as really supporting Java 8 or Java Lambdas, but instead 
allows the lambda syntax to be used in an unconventional way. I would think to 
be complete we would need methods that accept at least Supplier, Function, 
Predicate, although java.util.logging.Logger only supports Supplier.

On another note, how will the log4j-jul Logger deal with the Supplier? Will it 
resolve the result there or pass the Supplier along (which it can't do if we 
use a Callable). To support the new methods we will either have to create a new 
log4j-jul8 module or use reflection tricks to support them.


was (Author: [email protected]):
I just looked at the branch and am struggling a little bit with what I see - it 
doesn't strike me as really supporting Java 8 or Java Lambdas, but instead 
allows the lambda syntax to be used . I would think to be complete we would 
need methods that accept at least Supplier, Function, Predicate, although 
java.util.logging.Logger only supports Supplier.

On another note, how will the log4j-jul Logger deal with the Supplier? Will it 
resolve the result there or pass the Supplier along (which it can't do if we 
use a Callable). To support the new methods we will either have to create a new 
log4j-jul8 module or use reflection tricks to support them.

> Support lambda functions (or similar) for log message parameters
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-599
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-599
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Matt Sicker
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: Java8
>
> It would be nice if we could support 0-param lambda functions (or the 
> equivalent: interfaces with a single empty-parameter message call), or more 
> simply, allow Runnables (or something similar) to be passed which will be 
> dynamically executed if the log message is enabled.
> The use case here is that although string construction of the log message is 
> a performance issue that is already solved quite well, the problem of adding 
> in information to the log message that makes other calculations still needs 
> to be wrapped in an if check.
> I'm not sure if it'd be best to just use Runnable, or create a new interface, 
> or try to emulate how Java 1.8 lambdas work via an interface with a single 
> method defined. The details here would still need to be fleshed out, but I 
> think this sort of feature could be rather handy (especially in a Java 1.8+ 
> environment, or in Groovy/Scala/etc.).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to