[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14662811#comment-14662811
]
Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-599 at 8/8/15 5:11 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------
I just looked at the branch and am struggling a little bit with what I see - it
doesn't strike me as really supporting Java 8 or Java Lambdas, but instead
allows the lambda syntax to be used in an unconventional way. I would think to
be complete we would need methods that accept at least Supplier, Function,
Predicate, although java.util.logging.Logger only supports Supplier.
On another note, how will the log4j-jul Logger deal with the Supplier? Will it
resolve the result there or pass the Supplier along (which it can't do if we
use a Callable). To support the new methods we will either have to create a new
log4j-jul8 module or use reflection tricks to support them.
was (Author: [email protected]):
I just looked at the branch and am struggling a little bit with what I see - it
doesn't strike me as really supporting Java 8 or Java Lambdas, but instead
allows the lambda syntax to be used . I would think to be complete we would
need methods that accept at least Supplier, Function, Predicate, although
java.util.logging.Logger only supports Supplier.
On another note, how will the log4j-jul Logger deal with the Supplier? Will it
resolve the result there or pass the Supplier along (which it can't do if we
use a Callable). To support the new methods we will either have to create a new
log4j-jul8 module or use reflection tricks to support them.
> Support lambda functions (or similar) for log message parameters
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-599
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-599
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Matt Sicker
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: Java8
>
> It would be nice if we could support 0-param lambda functions (or the
> equivalent: interfaces with a single empty-parameter message call), or more
> simply, allow Runnables (or something similar) to be passed which will be
> dynamically executed if the log message is enabled.
> The use case here is that although string construction of the log message is
> a performance issue that is already solved quite well, the problem of adding
> in information to the log message that makes other calculations still needs
> to be wrapped in an if check.
> I'm not sure if it'd be best to just use Runnable, or create a new interface,
> or try to emulate how Java 1.8 lambdas work via an interface with a single
> method defined. The details here would still need to be fleshed out, but I
> think this sort of feature could be rather handy (especially in a Java 1.8+
> environment, or in Groovy/Scala/etc.).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]