[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15065421#comment-15065421
]
Sampath Kumar commented on LOG4J2-1221:
---------------------------------------
If Proposed solution completely avoids the dead lock ?
Below are additional changes i am proposing
1.Suppose Application doesn't want to drop the events,log4j should provides
default implementation for logging through Sync
2.log4j should notifies the application set buffer size is not optimum through
some warning log to application console.
> Dead lock observed in BlockingWaitStrategy in Log 4J
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1221
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1221
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 2.2
> Environment: log4J Version : 2.2 Disruptor Version : 3.3.2
> Ring Buffer Size : 128
> OS Version :
> cat /etc/release
> Oracle Solaris 11.2 X86
> Java Version
> java version "1.7.0_45"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_45-b18)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 24.45-b08, mixed mode)
> Reporter: Sampath Kumar
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: patch
>
> We have seen this behavior in during high load. Where Logging Got Stropped
> and Application Went to not responsive state.
> log4J Version : 2.2 Disruptor Version : 3.3.2
> Ring Buffer Size : 128
> Producer(Multiples Threads) and Consumer Threads(Single Thread As per Log 4J
> Configuration) Started Waiting on each other.
> Here is the one of the Trace from Thread Dump:
> Producer :
> "[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default
> (self-tuning)'" TIMED_WAITING
> sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:349)
> com.lmax.disruptor.MultiProducerSequencer.next(MultiProducerSequencer.java:136)
> com.lmax.disruptor.MultiProducerSequencer.next(MultiProducerSequencer.java:105)
> com.lmax.disruptor.RingBuffer.publishEvent(RingBuffer.java:444)
> com.lmax.disruptor.dsl.Disruptor.publishEvent(Disruptor.java:256)
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.AsyncLogger.logMessage(AsyncLogger.java:285)
> org.apache.logging.log4j.spi.AbstractLogger.logMessage(AbstractLogger.java:722)
> org.apache.logging.log4j.spi.AbstractLogger.logIfEnabled(AbstractLogger.java:693)
> org.apache.logging.log4j.jcl.Log4jLog.debug(Log4jLog.java:81)
> Consumer Thread :
> "AsyncLogger-1" waiting for lock
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@5d972983
> WAITING
> sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2043)
> com.lmax.disruptor.BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:45)
> com.lmax.disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:55)
> com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.java:123)
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
> Is this is known issue which got already fixed in recent build ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
