I am not sure how that “patch” integrates with Log4j but I get the idea of the 
problem. To be honest, I have very mixed feelings about creating a patch 
release for this.

Ralph

> On Jul 14, 2016, at 7:56 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> According to this poster, it appears 1.x is not compatible with JDK 9:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008654.html 
> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008654.html>
> 
> I told them I would notify our development community. So here's the 
> notification. :-) 
> 
> Given how widely used 1.x is still, what do you guys think of one more 1.x 
> release? Usually I would never entertain the suggestion, but this may be the 
> one time the justification makes sense. For those who still use 1.x and have 
> no time to upgrade to 2.x, I can't think of a better way to support the user 
> community than fix this issue.
> 
> PS: Inside the post is a link to the supposed patch.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Cheers,
> Paul

Reply via email to