Well that's a bit of a blocker for me. Oracle/Sun did not distribute 1.4.2 for Mac, and Apple's 1.4.2 won't install on my Mac because it doesn't think it needs to. I may need a Linux VM or Docker container for this.
On 14 July 2016 at 10:52, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > Matt, I guess you need JDK 1.4.2 on your machine to have artifact > "sun.jdk:tools:jar:1.4.2". > > Cheers, > Paul > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> How do you even build log4j 1.2? I get this error when I build from trunk: >> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2:run (javadoc.resources) on >> project log4j: Execution javadoc.resources of goal >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2:run failed: Plugin >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2 or one of its dependencies >> could not be resolved: Could not find artifact sun.jdk:tools:jar:1.4.2 at >> specified path >> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_66.jdk/Contents/Home/jre/../Classes/classes.jar >> -> [Help 1] >> >> On 14 July 2016 at 10:47, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Why would we want to do that? We need to make sure that Log4j 2 works >>> well with Java 9, but otherwise I think this is an excellent opportunity >>> for users to upgrade to Log4j 2. >>> >>> Remko >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> According to this poster, it appears 1.x is not compatible with JDK 9: >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008654.html >>>> >>>> I told them I would notify our development community. So here's the >>>> notification. :-) >>>> >>>> Given how widely used 1.x is still, what do you guys think of one more >>>> 1.x release? Usually I would never entertain the suggestion, but this may >>>> be the one time the justification makes sense. For those who still use 1.x >>>> and have no time to upgrade to 2.x, I can't think of a better way to >>>> support the user community than fix this issue. >>>> >>>> PS: Inside the post is a link to the supposed patch. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Paul >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
