C DLL? What was that for? Ralph
> On Jul 14, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are 2 issues with build log4j 1 IIRC: Getting the Java part to build > and getting the C DLL to build. Both require old stuff laying around in just > the right places. > > Gary > > On Jul 14, 2016 9:02 AM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: > That would rule out building on a Mac. I’d have to try it from a Linux VM. > I think Gary might have built Log4j 1 in the past. > > Ralph > >> On Jul 14, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org >> <mailto:pbened...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> Matt, I guess you need JDK 1.4.2 on your machine to have artifact >> "sun.jdk:tools:jar:1.4.2". >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com >> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> How do you even build log4j 1.2? I get this error when I build from trunk: >> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2:run (javadoc.resources) on >> project log4j: Execution javadoc.resources of goal >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2:run failed: Plugin >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2 or one of its dependencies >> could not be resolved: Could not find artifact sun.jdk:tools:jar:1.4.2 at >> specified path >> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_66.jdk/Contents/Home/jre/../Classes/classes.jar >> -> [Help 1] >> >> On 14 July 2016 at 10:47, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com >> <mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Why would we want to do that? We need to make sure that Log4j 2 works well >> with Java 9, but otherwise I think this is an excellent opportunity for >> users to upgrade to Log4j 2. >> >> Remko >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org >> <mailto:pbened...@apache.org>> wrote: >> According to this poster, it appears 1.x is not compatible with JDK 9: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008654.html >> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008654.html> >> >> I told them I would notify our development community. So here's the >> notification. :-) >> >> Given how widely used 1.x is still, what do you guys think of one more 1.x >> release? Usually I would never entertain the suggestion, but this may be the >> one time the justification makes sense. For those who still use 1.x and have >> no time to upgrade to 2.x, I can't think of a better way to support the user >> community than fix this issue. >> >> PS: Inside the post is a link to the supposed patch. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> >> >
