Fair enough. I am wondering if there is a design reason not to implement Map now that we have the opportunity with the TCM2 interface. I'd take a crack at it.
Gary On Aug 20, 2016 10:39 AM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > Because Map has a lot more methods that weren’t needed and I didn’t want > to implement? > > Ralph > > On Aug 20, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All: > > Now that we have ThreadContextMap2: > > Why don't we do ThreadContextMap2 extends Map<String, String>? > > Why did ThreadContextMap initially not extends Map<String, String>? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > >
