I like that much better... log4j-jvm instead of jvmlang I think. Gary
On Nov 12, 2016 6:00 PM, "Remko Popma" <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Looking at LOG4J2-1705, I was thinking that requiring a separate repository for each language could increase the barrier to entry for ideas like that. > > Would it be a good idea to create a single repository (logging-log4j-jvmlang?) which would hold modules for all non-java JVM languages, like scala, kotlin, groovy, jruby, ... ?
