Hm, on 2nd though I'm not sure if I'd want to pick up all JVM lang updates if I only care about one...
Gary On Nov 12, 2016 6:08 PM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like that much better... log4j-jvm instead of jvmlang I think. > > Gary > > On Nov 12, 2016 6:00 PM, "Remko Popma" <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Looking at LOG4J2-1705, I was thinking that requiring a separate > repository for each language could increase the barrier to entry for ideas > like that. > > > > Would it be a good idea to create a single repository > (logging-log4j-jvmlang?) which would hold modules for all non-java JVM > languages, like scala, kotlin, groovy, jruby, ... ? >
