[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15791838#comment-15791838 ]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1761: ------------------------------------- [~Kim Northrop] What problem are you trying to solve? > Support for standard java queues for the async logger > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LOG4J2-1761 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1761 > Project: Log4j 2 > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 2.7 > Reporter: Kim Northrop > Priority: Minor > Attachments: AsyncLogEvent.java, AsyncLoggerWithQueue.java, > AsyncLoggerWithQueueContext.java, AsyncLoggerWithQueueContextSelector.java, > QueueWrapper.java, QueueWrapperCLQ.java, QueueWrapperLBQ.java, > QueueWrapperLTQ.java > > > Please add support for standard java queues (LinkedTransferQueue, > ArrayBlockingQueue, LinkedBlockingQueue, ConcurrentLinkedQueue) to the async > logger. I will attach some classes for usage with System properties > (Log4jContextSelector=org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.AsyncLoggerWithQueueContextSelector, > LoggerQueue.Capacity=<capacity>, LoggerQueue.Type=<currently one of > LinkedTransferQueue, ConcurrentLinkedQueue, LinkedBlockingQueue>). Since most > of these queues allocate new nodes for new elements I have not implemented > usage of thread locals for the log events. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org