How do I add myself as a reviewer?

Ralph

> On Jan 17, 2017, at 2:05 PM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com> wrote:
> 
> OK, Pull Request here:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/55 
> <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/55>
> 
> On Jan 17, 2017 6:58 PM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Are you able to make a PR on GitHub for review? That'd be a neat way to 
> interactively review our own internal branches. Not sure if you need to do it 
> from a fork, though.
> 
> On 17 January 2017 at 10:20, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com 
> <mailto:mikael.stal...@magine.com>> wrote:
> I think we should get LOG4J2-1748 and LOG4J2-1780 resolved before 2.8, I have 
> a branch out for review.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I'm working on getting the Log4j Scala repo set up independently from the 
> main Log4j repo (and doing Log4j Boot on the side; this will be released 
> independently, so don't worry about this blocking anything) and doing some 
> general site cleanups and whatnot. For 2.8, the other non-core modules will 
> most likely remain where they are and the Log4j Scala API repo gets to be our 
> first foray into the separated repos space.
> 
> Feature-wise, are there any other things we'd like to complete before cutting 
> a 2.8 release? Based on the ongoing Zookeeper migration, I see the pain 
> points of migrating config formats being brought up again, so it would be 
> great to get our Log4j 1 config support in this release, but that depends on 
> timing, too (we could always RERO and add it to the next release if nobody 
> has time to finish that feature).
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  
> 
> Mikael Ståldal
> Senior software developer 
> 
> Magine TV
> mikael.stal...@magine.com <mailto:mikael.stal...@magine.com>    
> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com  
> <http://www.magine.com/>
> 
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
> If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not 
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, 
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>

Reply via email to