That maven-compiler-plugin config was originally only included in
log4j-core in order to allow the PluginProcessor annotation processor to
re-run against log4j-core without needing to split it into its own jar. I'm
not sure why it's configured for everything now.

On 29 January 2017 at 08:59, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> Yes.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 28, 2017, at 11:59 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ralph, are your benchmark results with 4 threads (-t 4)?
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
>> While I couldn’t get it to work with Log4j 2.8 the results I get for 2.7
>> do not match Ceki’s at all.  These are the results for Java 7:
>>
>> Benchmark                                                           Mode
>>  Samples        Score        Error  Units
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.julFile             thrpt       10
>> 105746.361 ±   2995.187  ops/s
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j1File       thrpt       10
>> 811996.955 ±  18110.525  ops/s
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j2File       thrpt       10
>> 1986884.744 ±  42949.953  ops/s
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j2RAF      thrpt       10
>> 4020251.137 ± 176621.025  ops/s
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.logbackFile    thrpt       10
>>  228331.672 ±   2420.898  ops/s
>>
>> Here are the numbers for Java 8:
>>
>> Benchmark                                                           Mode
>>  Samples        Score        Error  Units
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.julFile             thrpt       10
>> 105836.910 ±   9430.973  ops/s
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j1File       thrpt       10
>> 816316.422 ±  12492.398  ops/s
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j2File       thrpt       10
>>  2042991.944 ±  15957.247  ops/s
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j2RAF      thrpt       10
>> 4006968.171 ± 285275.918  ops/s
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.logbackFile    thrpt       10
>>  231574.725 ±   2266.484  ops/s
>>
>>
>> To correlate to microseconds as Ceki is doing, I get 105 for jul, 816 for
>> log4j 1, 2042 for Log4j 2, 4007 for Log4j 2 RAF, and 232 for Logback. I
>> think he must have somehow lost a digit for log4j as that would correlate
>> with the numbers he reported.
>>
>> My machine has 4 cores (8 hyper threads) and is using an SSD.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2017, at 12:39 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> I can no longer get the benchmarks to work. I get
>>
>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Benchmark does not match a class
>> at org.openjdk.jmh.util.ClassUtils.loadClass(ClassUtils.java:90)
>> at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.BaseRunner.runBenchmark(BaseRunner.java:198)
>> at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.BaseRunner.runBenchmarks(BaseRunner.java:95)
>> at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.ForkedRunner.run(ForkedRunner.java:51)
>> at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.ForkedMain.main(ForkedMain.java:68)
>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>> org.apache.logging.log4j.perf.jmh.generated.FileAppenderBenchmark_julFile
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)
>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)
>> at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
>> at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:195)
>> at org.openjdk.jmh.util.ClassUtils.loadClass(ClassUtils.java:72)
>> ... 4 more
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2017, at 6:13 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2017, at 9:38, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I want to ask a favor: can anyone run the FileAppenderBenchmark
>> benchmark
>> (with -f 1 -wi 10 -i 10 -t 4) and post the summary? Someone is reporting
>> a performance regression.
>>
>> This is the regression report:
>> https://mobile.twitter.com/ceki/status/825368324146155520
>>
>> https://mobile.twitter.com/ceki/status/825370795157368832
>>
>>
>> I get a strange error when trying to run JMH benchmarks and wonder if it
>> is just me.
>>
>> Remko
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to