Can you point me at some info on that? What massive changes are needed? Remko
Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 7, 2017, at 1:36, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > I fixed the only problem I could find last week. However, we still have more > to do as we really need to support the StackWalker API and the “right” way to > do it would require massive changes. I also need to benchmark the cost of > invoking the StackWalker API to return the method’s caller to see what the > impact would be to do it on every logging call. > > Ralph > >> On Feb 6, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I remember Ralph mentioned that he tested it out and found that it worked >> pretty well. See issue: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1359> >> >> On 6 February 2017 at 09:56, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, but is the new stack walking >>> API in Java 9 of any use for us? I believe applications/libraries like >>> Log4j were supposed to be the drivers behind this feature, but last time I >>> checked they were not going to cater for our use case (inspect the stack >>> from the bottom up)... >>> >>> From a functional point of view, is anybody aware of anything outstanding >>> we need to fix for Log4j 2 to work correctly on Java 9? >>> >>> Remko >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >
