Sorry, I forgot to reply. The specific thread begins with 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-May/040826.html 
<http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-May/040826.html> and 
the specific message is 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-May/041029.html 
<http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-May/041029.html> 
where they recommend getting the caller’s stack frame from each logging method.

Ralph

> On Feb 6, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Can you point me at some info on that? What massive changes are needed?
> 
> Remko
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Feb 7, 2017, at 1:36, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com 
> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
> 
>> I fixed the only problem I could find last week. However, we still have more 
>> to do as we really need to support the StackWalker API and the “right” way 
>> to do it would require massive changes. I also need to benchmark the cost of 
>> invoking the StackWalker API to return the method’s caller to see what the 
>> impact would be to do it on every logging call.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Feb 6, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I remember Ralph mentioned that he tested it out and found that it worked 
>>> pretty well. See issue: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1359 
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1359>>
>>> 
>>> On 6 February 2017 at 09:56, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, but is the new stack walking 
>>> API in Java 9 of any use for us? I believe applications/libraries like 
>>> Log4j were supposed to be the drivers behind this feature, but last time I 
>>> checked they were not going to cater for our use case (inspect the stack 
>>> from the bottom up)... 
>>> 
>>> From a functional point of view, is anybody aware of anything outstanding 
>>> we need to fix for Log4j 2 to work correctly on Java 9?
>>> 
>>> Remko
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
>> 

Reply via email to